By MENNA ZAKI
KHARTOUM - Grasping an empty plastic bottle that stands in for a microphone, young Sudanese protester Abu Bakr Marghani pretends to be a journalist interviewing demonstrators at Khartoum’s sit-in outside the army complex.
The would-be correspondent is cheered by his small crew each time he thrusts the device in front of a peer and asks a question.
“We mean to poke fun at Sudanese state media who did not take our side during the protests,” said Marghani, 18.
“They did not cover it at all - only foreign media did,” he said, as one of his buddies holds a wooden stick with a plastic cup dangling from one end, in a creative attempt to mimic an adjustable boom mic.
Another friend carries a cardboard box on his shoulder as if it’s a video camera, complete with the scribbled name of a foreign TV network.
Since December 19, Sudan has been rocked by protests that finally led last month to the ouster of president Omar Al-Bashir, who was in power for three decades.
Protesters remain encamped outside the military complex, demanding that the generals who toppled Bashir on April 11 be replaced by a civilian administration.
State media’s complete blackout of the months of demonstrations prior to his ouster - including a failure to report the deaths of dozens at the hands of security forces - left protesters fuming.
Instead, state-run Sudan TV broadcast Bashir’s rallies, government business and light viewing.
“People were dying for four full months and all the Sudanese media broadcast was cooking shows,” blasted Marghani.
The pro-regime newspapers stuck to reporting day-to-day government activities.
“They only started siding with us after Bashir was toppled.”
Sudan TV said it had to comply with government directives.
“The news broadcast was within the limits allowed by the government at the time,” Sudan TV news director Mozamel Suleiman told AFP.
“We are owned by the state and our narrative had to conform to the state’s general policy.”
Angry protesters have since on several occasions forced state media journalists out of the sit-in when they come to report on it.
Marghani stopped a protester to ask his view of the ruling army generals.
The quick response was “fall or no fall, we are staying” - a rallying cry of the protest movement.
During Bashir’s long tenure, the press was severely curtailed, according to media activists.
The country’s feared National Intelligence and Security Agency (NISS) cracked down regularly on journalists who questioned Bashir’s policies.
“News related to his regime, prominent opposition figures or conflict-torn areas in Sudan were problematic” for those who reported them, said leading Sudanese journalist Faisal Saleh.
NISS agents regularly confiscated entire print-runs of newspapers for publishing articles deemed critical of Bashir’s policies.
“Officers (of NISS) used to go to newspapers’ headquarters to check and cross out whatever they didn’t want published,” said Saleh.
“From sports news to political affairs, anything was subject to scrutiny.”
The confiscation of entire print-runs was a tactic to inflict maximum losses on publishers, said Osman Mirghani, editor-in-chief of independent newspaper Al Tayyar.
“It cost us a lot of money,” said Mirghani, whose editions were confiscated some 80 times under Bashir’s rule.
The editor was detained for more than a month during the peak of the protests against Bashir.
Media watchdog Reporters Without Borders recorded at least 100 cases of journalists being arrested during the protests.
But things appear to be changing since Bashir’s ouster.
Sudan TV has shown footage of the Khartoum sit-in.
Critics of Bashir now participate in talk shows on Sudan TV.
And local newspapers were quick to report his downfall.
“There is now no pre-censorship and newspapers go to print freely without running the risk of being confiscated,” said Mirghani.
Suleiman agrees that a wider range of news is now broadcast on Sudan TV.
AFP
