World

Zimbabwe ruling party challenges bid to overturn poll results

August 15, 2018
Tinomudaishe Chinyoka, one of the lawyers representing ZANU PF’s presidential candidate Emmerson Mnangagwa, arrives to file opposing papers at the Constitutional Court in Harare on Wednesday. — Reuters
Tinomudaishe Chinyoka, one of the lawyers representing ZANU PF’s presidential candidate Emmerson Mnangagwa, arrives to file opposing papers at the Constitutional Court in Harare on Wednesday. — Reuters

HARARE — Zimbabwe’s ruling ZANU-PF party on Wednesday filed a counterpetition challenging the opposition’s court bid to overturn election results that gave a narrow victory to incumbent Emmerson Mnangagwa.

ZANU-PF submitted its papers to the Constitutional Court, which is considering an appeal by the opposition MDC party alleging that the election was rigged in favor of Mnangagwa, Robert Mugabe’s former vice president.

The Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) has accused ZANU-PF and the election commission of ballot fraud in the July 30 vote, Zimbabwe’s first poll since the ousting of Mugabe in November.

“We have filed our papers opposing the petition filed by the MDC,” Paul Mangwana, a ZANU-PF spokesman and member of the legal team, said.

“It’s now up to the court to decide.”

Mnangagwa narrowly won the presidential race with 50.8 percent of the vote -- just enough to avoid a run-off against the MDC’s Nelson Chamisa, who scored 44.3 percent.

Mnangagwa’s inauguration — which has been planned for last Sunday — was postponed until the court makes its ruling.

Mnangagwa had vowed the elections would be free and fair, and would turn a page on Mugabe’s repressive 37-year rule.

The election was marred by the army opening fire on protesters, killing six, allegations of vote-rigging and a crackdown on opposition activists.

Analysts say that MDC’s legal challenge has little chance of success given the courts’ historic tilt towards ZANU-PF, which has ruled since independence from British colonial rule in 1980.

“It’s a high hurdle to get over,” Derek Matyszak, a senior researcher at the Institute of Security Studies, said. “It’s almost a foregone conclusion.”

Judges have 14 days from Aug. 10 to rule on the case. — AFP


August 15, 2018
80 views
HIGHLIGHTS
World
8 hours ago

Man held over Paris bomb threat at Iran consulate

World
8 hours ago

Trump criminal case: Jury selection reaches final stage

World
8 hours ago

Beijing half marathon: Top three stripped of medals after investigation